During our presentation I felt an unfair statement was made about how our entire project could be done on google maps. While a similar sort of thing can be done, I feel that this is not true. Users can upload there own content such as videos but when I clicked on the club Thekla one video had been uploaded from 2007 and the rest was reviews and heavily text based. We want our project to rely on visual content to give the user a feel for the place and regular uploads of the most recent nights, not one from four years ago. Furthermore we want to show the users 'off the map' places of interest that wouldn't normally appear in tourist guides or maps, such as little restaurants, sandwich bars, shops and little clubs. When researching for our project we chose places we wanted to put on our site such as Basement 45, Shake Wrap And Roll, The Bank and Lakota among others. None of these places mentioned even appear on google maps (unless you went on street view), let alone been reviewed or have any sort of visual content added to them.
Finally another quote I found interesting and relates to our project this week comes from Jay David Bulter and Richard Grusin who say 'the desire for immediacy is apparent in claims that digital images are more exciting, lively and realistic than mere text on a computer screen'.
